Thanks guys. You could smell this one coming from a mile away. Some people don't want to accept the fact that Vegas just doesn't make mistakes this time of year. Had Okie State covered, they would have had their asses handed to them, as the entire free world, and even some of the communist world, was on Okie State. Again, lines are SO DAMNED tight this time of year, that, when you get some value presented by the public action, you HAVE to take it. In all honesty, either team could have won this game, and, if Lucas doesn't hit a very, very tough three at the end of the game, this is St. Joe's game.
This was my biggest bet of the year (equivalent to a 5 unit play, which, for me, is unprecedented), but, there was too much value to pass up.
JP
This was my biggest bet of the year (equivalent to a 5 unit play, which, for me, is unprecedented), but, there was too much value to pass up.
JP
Nice pick...I wish I would have had the balls to bet against OSU. They were so impressive in beating a tough Pitt team I just couldn't go against them; however I did respond in someone's thread before the game that Vegas is smarter than we are, but still couldn't pull the trigger against the small line. It's so much fun when you are on Vegas' side.
[/QUOTE]
23-28-1, -7.5 units
Congrats.[/QUOTE]
I have watched from afar and I thought your overall numbers were much worse then this. Why do you care so much about your record being shown? It only helps people that are looking for solid or not so solid info. Good call yesterday on st.joes. That game was a toss-up and the sharpe money didn't play either side.
23-28-1, -7.5 units
Congrats.[/QUOTE]
I have watched from afar and I thought your overall numbers were much worse then this. Why do you care so much about your record being shown? It only helps people that are looking for solid or not so solid info. Good call yesterday on st.joes. That game was a toss-up and the sharpe money didn't play either side.
If you are SOS, with your 13 posts, then bug off. If you aren't, then you must knhow that there is a history there, and the guy likes to incite. And, by the way, the record isn't indicative, because I'm something like 5-0 on posted plays of greater than 1 unit. Of course SOS doesn't post that. In addition to the fact that the sample size that he is taking is not indicative of what I do either.
JP
JP
Every post where a line is specified is included in your documented plays.
Plays where you specify a line and then comeback after the fact and say it was for 5+ units are not documented at 5 units, but rather at 1. Anyone can comeback after the fact and say they had more or less on a certain game.
The documentation has been fair -- as I ignored things such as your Oscar picks (0-10, -10 units) and plays such as your ACC championship play on Duke where it was obvious from your posting that you were on Duke, but never specified a line / unit amount.
You actually were documenting yourself at the very beginning, but then of course when you dipped below 5 units you mysteriously stopped. I'm simply keeping track for you and those that follow your advice. I'll refrain from posting anything insulting, I'll just simply post your record so people can know whether going with your advice would be wise or not. You claim you are a professional gambler, and I believe this gives people the false sense of security that you actually know what you are talking about. Keeping a documented record for you lets them know whether your information is credible or not. Unless you have something to hide, why would you care if your record is posted?
Plays where you specify a line and then comeback after the fact and say it was for 5+ units are not documented at 5 units, but rather at 1. Anyone can comeback after the fact and say they had more or less on a certain game.
The documentation has been fair -- as I ignored things such as your Oscar picks (0-10, -10 units) and plays such as your ACC championship play on Duke where it was obvious from your posting that you were on Duke, but never specified a line / unit amount.
You actually were documenting yourself at the very beginning, but then of course when you dipped below 5 units you mysteriously stopped. I'm simply keeping track for you and those that follow your advice. I'll refrain from posting anything insulting, I'll just simply post your record so people can know whether going with your advice would be wise or not. You claim you are a professional gambler, and I believe this gives people the false sense of security that you actually know what you are talking about. Keeping a documented record for you lets them know whether your information is credible or not. Unless you have something to hide, why would you care if your record is posted?
